Página Inicial > Artigos > Ena Smith

» Artigos

  • Compartilhe 
  • Ena Glaucia Smith
  • Texto Times e Vocabulário

    11/10/2012

    Hello alunos e admiradores do Eu Vou Passar,

     

    No artigo de hoje destaquei vocabulário voltado para o legislativo, para quem vai fazer Câmara ou TCE esse fim de semana, será uma revisão.

     

         In Virginia beach a few weeks ago, at the start of my recent road trip, I was staggered by an unexpected blast of political sanity. It came in the person of Scott Rigell, a freshman House Republican. Rigell had signed the ghastly Grover Norquist no-tax pledge when he ran for office in 2010. Once elected, Rigell began to wonder about his vow never to vote for a tax increase. He did some research into the past 50 years of taxing and spending--and then he publicly reneged on the pledge, receiving a squalid earful from Norquist in the process. Rigell's calculations form the basis of what should be a new slogan for the sane center: 20/20 FORESIGHT.

     

    stagger = vacilar emocionalmente, cambalear

    blast = explosão

    no-tax pledge =  pacto não-fiscal

    vow = voto

    foresight = previsão

     

    In his Virginia Beach office, Rigell, 52, pulled out an easel and magic marker and showed me how he'd come to his conclusion: "You have to see it in context," he said, writing "'Bush' tax cuts" on the board. He put Bush in quotation marks because he didn't like using a President's name pejoratively to describe a program. He insisted on calling Obamacare by its proper name: the Affordable Care Act. Anyhow, he wrote "16.9%" on his pad. "That's our average revenues as a percentage of gross domestic product over the past 11 years, and it's a good firm figure. It includes good years and bad ones." Revenue was up to 18.2% of GDP at the end of the housing bubble in 2006 and down to 15.1% after the Wall Street bust. "Now can you tell me the last time we ran a government with 16.9% revenues? 1959. Before Medicare and Medicaid."

     

    Bush' tax cut = plano de redução de impostos do governo Bush

    GDP - gross domestic product = PIB - Produto Interno Bruto

    Cuidado para não confundir os dois planos abaixo:

    Medicare = plano de seguro de saúde americano subsidiado pelo governo federal para idosos do país, que são pelo menos 65 anos de idade, bem como indivíduos abaixo dos 65 com uma qualificação médica de deficiência ou doença.

    Medicaid = plano de saúde americano que beneficia certas pessoas ou famílias de baixa renda e escassos recursos.

     

    He flipped another sheet of paper on the easel and wrote two big numbers, the historical averages for revenue and spending for the past 50 years: 17.9% revenue, 20.5% spending. "Our current rate of spending is 24%, which is very high, given the historical context." Rigell acknowledged that revenue may increase when the economy begins to grow and that current spending levels may be slightly bloated both by the Obama stimulus and a range of benefits for the unemployed. Indeed, he seemed to make it a matter of personal honor that he included every nuance. Our meeting lasted more than an hour as he laid it out.

     

    Current rate of spending = atual taxa de gastos

    Bloat = excesso

    Range = variedade, série

    Indeed = na verdade, de fato

     

    When Rigell realized these facts, he began to talk to economists, businesspeople and policy experts. "I talked to Warren Buffett," he said--and that, in today's Republican Party, is about as taboo as acknowledging the need to raise revenue. Another sheet of paper on the easel. Two staggered rows of numbers:

     

    acknowledge = reconhecer, confirmar

                       

    The top line was the range of spending numbers. The second line was the revenue numbers. Rigell ran on 18% spending, he said, would hope for a balance of 19% spending and revenue, but could be dragged kicking and screaming to 20%. (Buffett was in the 19%-to-20% range for revenue and 21% for spending; I'd be a bit higher.) Now, obviously, this was a broad-brush calculation--and it elided a major philosophical difference between liberals and conservatives: whether government should increase spending to goose a dormant economy during a recession. But 20/20 did seem to be the basis for a reasonable discussion of a long-term deficit deal. The trouble, of course, is that there is a yawning void of reasonable discussers in the House of Representatives.

     

    goose ? injetar, cutucar

    House of Representatives ? Câmara dos Deputados

     

    Rigel has launched his own sanity effort?the Fix Congress Now Caucus?which Representative Jim Cooper of Tennessee, a famously moderate Democrat, has joined. The first item on the agenda is a bill to stop paying members until they actually pass a budget. Cooper would like that budget to resemble the report issued by the Simpson-Bowles deficit commission (which favored a 21% revenue solution). "So far we've had a press conference," Cooper told me with disgust. "It's easy to hold a press conference but hard to vote right. I've been very impressed with the willingness of Republicans like Rigell and Reid Ribble of Wisconsin to say the right things. The question is, Will they be willing to vote against their party's leadership when it counts or are they just trying to look moderate in their districts in an election year?"

     

    Bill ? projeto de lei

    Actually ? na verdade, na realidade

    Budget - orçamento

    Party's leadership ? liderança do partido

     

    For Cooper, the bright-line test was the up-or-down vote the House took on Simpson-Bowles a few months ago: only 38 members, a mix of Democrats and Republicans, voted for the measure. Rigell and Ribble voted against. "I didn't think that proposal addressed health-care inflation," Rigell told me. "I'm taking this one step at a time. My Republican colleagues say, Let's do the cuts first. The Democrats say, Let's do spending first. I'd like to do both simultaneously." Actually, that's not quite accurate: Republicans have opposed any revenue increases; Democrats have proposed some cuts, but not in the crucial entitlement areas. Still, Rigell's courage should be applauded: 20/20 foresight is a rare commodity in our disgracefully contentious politics these days.

    The original version of this story indicated that Rep. Jim Cooper launched Fix Congress Now. The caucus was created by Rep. Scott Rigell.

     

    entitlement ? subvenção, direito a subsídio

    Fonte: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2118303,00.html#ixzz21fFCKh1N


    Alguns alunos tem me perguntado sobre material para o concurso ATPS do MPOG, aqui no Eu Vou Passar você tem vídeo aulas ESAF. Mas se o seu Inglês for básico você realmente vai precisar de um reforço, que é o curso específico para ATPS no Estratégia, o qual inclui a  parte  gramatical. Segue o link:

     http://www.estrategiaconcursos.com.br/professor/800/cursos

     

    See you,

    Ena Smith

     enaglaucia@euvoupassar.com.br      enaglaucia@gmail.com

     

    • Compartilhe 


    Eu Vou Passar® - Copyright 2010. Todos os direitos reservados.

    Eu Vou Passar Comércio de Livros e Materiais Didáticos e Serviços Educacionais Ltda
    Av. Lins Petit, 320 - Salas 403/404 - Boa Vista - Recife - PE - CEP 50.070-230
    CNPJ: 11.292.078/0001-43